PulseAugur
LIVE 10:03:51
research · [2 sources] ·
7
research

Claude Mythos tops GPT-5.5 on exploit benchmark, but at higher cost

Anthropic's Claude Mythos model has achieved a score of 9.9 out of 16 on CMU's ExploitBench, significantly outperforming OpenAI's GPT-5.5, which scored 5.5. However, Claude Mythos is considerably more expensive to run, costing over 12 times more per execution than GPT-5.5. Separately, a specialized CLAUDE.md file has been developed to address CSS issues in Claude Code, improving its mobile compatibility and preventing common display problems. AI

Summary written by gemini-2.5-flash-lite from 2 sources. How we write summaries →

IMPACT Claude Mythos demonstrates superior performance on exploit detection, though its high cost may limit widespread adoption compared to GPT-5.5.

RANK_REASON Benchmark results for AI models are reported.

Read on Mastodon — fosstodon.org →

COVERAGE [2]

  1. Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 · [email protected] ·

    CLAUDE.md for Mobile: How One File Fixes Claude Code's CSS Blindspot A specialized CLAUDE.md file fixes Claude Code's generic CSS by injecting mobile-specific r

    CLAUDE.md for Mobile: How One File Fixes Claude Code's CSS Blindspot A specialized CLAUDE.md file fixes Claude Code's generic CSS by injecting mobile-specific rules, preventing iOS zoom, untappable buttons, and dark mode failures before shipping. https:// gentic.news/article/clau…

  2. Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 · [email protected] ·

    CMU Benchmark: Claude Mythos Hits 9.9/16 on V8 Exploits, GPT-5.5 Trails at 5.5 CMU's ExploitBench shows Claude Mythos scores 9.9/16 on V8 exploits vs GPT-5.5's

    CMU Benchmark: Claude Mythos Hits 9.9/16 on V8 Exploits, GPT-5.5 Trails at 5.5 CMU's ExploitBench shows Claude Mythos scores 9.9/16 on V8 exploits vs GPT-5.5's 5.5, but costs $36,428 per run — 12x more. The cost-performance tradeoff is the real story. https:// gentic.news/article…