Embodied LLMs perform better with noisy, raw visual input than perfect data

A new research paper explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) integrated into robotic systems perform on complex tasks. The study found that providing LLMs with raw RGB visual input led to better problem-solving than offering perfect, ground-truth symbolic observations. Counterintuitively, introducing a moderate level of noise or random errors in the observed outcomes actually improved the LLMs' performance, reducing repetitive action loops and increasing success rates. AI

Summary written by gemini-2.5-flash-lite from 1 source. How we write summaries →

IMPACT Suggests that current evaluation metrics for embodied LLMs may be misleading, as performance can be boosted by perceptual errors rather than robust problem-solving.

RANK_REASON Research paper published on arXiv detailing experimental findings on LLM behavior in embodied tasks. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.AI →

• Large Language Models
• Lockbox

• paper
• other