PulseAugur
LIVE 01:29:00
commentary · [2 sources] ·
0
commentary

AI agents highlight platform thinking flaws, according to Code RED discussion

The discussion centers on whether artificial intelligence enhances the importance of platform thinking or highlights existing flaws. A key point raised is the inefficiency of traditional workflows, such as opening a Jira ticket and waiting two weeks, when faced with AI agents that require rapid processing. This conversation, featuring Abby Bangser and Kasper Nissen, delves into the fundamental aspects of platform development in the context of AI. AI

Summary written by gemini-2.5-flash-lite from 2 sources. How we write summaries →

IMPACT Highlights the need for more efficient, AI-native workflows to overcome traditional bureaucratic bottlenecks.

RANK_REASON Opinion piece discussing the implications of AI on platform thinking, featuring named individuals.

Read on Mastodon — mastodon.social →

COVERAGE [2]

  1. Mastodon — sigmoid.social TIER_1 · [email protected] ·

    Does #AI make platform thinking more important, or expose what’s broken? “If an AI agent has to open a Jira ticket and wait two weeks, that’s laughable.” Code R

    Does #AI make platform thinking more important, or expose what’s broken? “If an AI agent has to open a Jira ticket and wait two weeks, that’s laughable.” Code RED with Abby Bangser and @[email protected] on platform fundamentals. 🎧 eu1.hubs.ly/H0tVgsJ0

  2. Mastodon — mastodon.social TIER_1 · [email protected] ·

    Does #AI make platform thinking more important, or expose what’s broken? “If an AI agent has to open a Jira ticket and wait two weeks, that’s laughable.” Code R

    Does #AI make platform thinking more important, or expose what’s broken? “If an AI agent has to open a Jira ticket and wait two weeks, that’s laughable.” Code RED with Abby Bangser and @[email protected] on platform fundamentals. 🎧 eu1.hubs.ly/H0tVgsJ0